Big Sky Debate

PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!! Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its February 2012 NFL Public Forum resources on the aid to Pakistan topic!  The resolution, released by the National Forensics League on February 1, 2012 is:

Resolved: The United States should suspend all assistance to Pakistan.

A list of briefs for this book appears below the fold.

NEW for 2011-2012: Get both the PDF and Word versions of the book.  Copy and paste Big Sky Debate's excellent research into your own briefs!

Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate's seasoned research staff at THREE times that cost!  Big Sky Debate is the best value in debate!  Download one file, right now, with all the resource you need for the aid to Pakistan.

Have a GREAT topic!!!  Our Public Forum Resources are an unbeatable $16.00.

Table of Contents

META DEBATE

• UNITED STATED COMMITTED TO AID PROGRAMS FOR PAKISTAN
• UNITED STATED AID TO PAKISTAN IS SIGNIFICANT

PRO

• PAKISTAN PEOPLE ARE SOLIDLY ANTI-AMERICAN
• US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP IS SOUR AND CAN’T BE SAVED
• AID INEFFECTIVE: DOESN’T HELP PERCEPTION OF THE US AMONG PAKISTANIS
• AID INEFFECTIVE: PERCEPTION OF THE US IS HURT BY DRONE STRIKES
• AID INEFFECTIVE: MOST AID DOESN’T MAKE IT TO THE INTENDED SUBJECTS
• AID INEFFECTIVE: MOST IS DIVERTED TO CORRUPT INSTITUTIONS
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: NOW IS A CRITICAL TIME TO RECONSIDER AID
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: PAKISTAN SUPPORTS TERRORISTS/INSURGENTS
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: PAKISTAN WON’T TARGET TERRORISTS
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: PAKISTAN HAS BANISHED US MILITARY PERSONNEL
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: PAKISTAN WAS HIDING BIN LADEN
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: PAKISTAN IS A LOUSY PARTNER
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: US PUBLIC SUPPORTS CUTTING AID
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: CONGRESS SUPPORTS CUTTING AID
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: WILL POSITIVELY IMPACT RELATIONSHIP WITH PAKISTAN
• SHOULD RECONSIDER AID: AID STOPS PAKISTAN FROM DEVELOPING THEMSELVES
• MUST CONSIDER PRO VIEW AS LEGITIMATE OR GIVE PAKISTAN ALL OF THE POWER
• A/T: MUST KEEP AID DUE TO AFGHANISTAN
• A/T: CUTTING AID = LOOSE NUKES
• A/T: PAKISTAN NEEDS MILITARY AID
• A/T: MUST KEEP RELATIONSHIP BECAUSE PAKISTAN IS VITAL TO THE US
• A/T: DON’T CUT, RESTRICT AND/OR CONDITION

CON

• US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP KEY: VITAL TO US INTERESTS
• US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP KEY: NOW IS KEY TIME FOR RELATIONS
• US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP KEY: US HAS INTELLIGENCE IN PAKISTAN
• US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP KEY: RELATIONSHIP WILL IMPROVE OVER TIME
• US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP KEY: PAKISTAN VITAL TO WAR IN AFGHANISTAN
• AID GOOD: NEEDED BY PAKISTAN CITIZENS
• AID GOOD: WINS SUPPORT AMONGST PAKISTAN PEOPLE
• AID GOOD: NEEDED TO HELP FIGHT TERRORISM
• ALTERNATIVE: DON’T CUT AID, CONDITION AID
• ALTERNATIVE: DON’T CUT AID, REBALANCE AID
• ENDING AID BAD: HISTORY PROVES CUTTING AID IS COUNTER PRODUCTIVE
• ENDING AID BAD: OTHER COUNTRIES THAT OFFER AID COULD HURT THE US STRATEGICALLY
• ENDING AID BAD: UNSTABLE PAKISTAN = LOOSE NUKES
• A/T: AID NOT BEING EFFECTIVELY USED/DISTRIBUTED
• A/T: PAKISTAN IS A LOUSY MILITARY PARTNER
• A/T: INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS SHOULD PROVIDE HUMANITARIAN AID
• A/T: PAKISTAN WAS HIDING BIN LADEN!