Big Sky Debate

PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!! Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its 2011 NFL Nationals Public Forum resources on intervention for democracy!  The resolution, released by the National Forensics League on May 1, 2011, is:

Resolved: That the United States should intervene in another nation’s struggle for democracy.

A list of briefs for this book appears below the fold.

Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate's seasoned research staff at THREE times that cost!  Big Sky Debate is the best value in debate!  Download one file, right now, with all the resource you need for the intervention for democracy topic.

Have a great experience at NFL Nationals in Dallas!!!  Our Public Forum Resources are an unbeatable $16.00.

PRO

• INTERVENTION GOOD: INTERVENTION FOR DEMOCRACY GOOD GENERALLY
• INTERVENTION GOOD: UNITED STATES HAS MORAL IMPERATIVE
• INTERVENTION GOOD: IN ABSENCE OF REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES, MILITARY INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED
• INTERVENTION GOOD: INTERVENTION SAFER IN THE POST-COLD WAR WORLD
• INTERVENTION GOOD: CAN BE EFFECTIVE AGAINST SOCIAL PROBLEMS
• INTERVENTION GOOD: US MUST INTERVENE TO KEEP CREDIBILITY
• DEMOCRACY GOOD: DECREASES TERRORISM
• DEMOCRACY GOOD: DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS DO NOT GO TO WAR
• DEMOCRACY GOOD: US HAS INTEREST IN EXPANSION OF DEMOCRACY
• DEMOCRACY GOOD: CAN THRIVE ANYWHERE
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED: GENERAL
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED: MUST PROTECT THE PEOPLE OF LIBYA
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED: STOPPED A WAR CRIME
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED: LEGAL IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED: MIDDLE EAST DEMOCRATIC INTERVENTIONS HELP THROUGH THE REGION
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION JUSTIFIED: TO AVOID IT WOULD STOP THE ARAB SPRING
• A/T: WHY LIBYA OVER OTHER NATION’S UPRISINGS?
• A/T: LIBYA = IRAQ
• A/T: DEMOCRACY CAN’T SURVIVE IN X COUNTRY
• A/T: DEMOCRACY CAN’T THRIVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST
• A/T: SHOULD WAIT TO INTERVENE WHEN VIOLENCE STOPS
  

CON

• INTERVENTION BAD: UNITED STATES MUST LET DEMOCRACY GROW ORGANICALLY AND NOT INTERVENE
• INTERVENTION BAD: MUST NOT FALL FOR THE “DO SOMETHING” ARGUMENT
• INTERVENTION BAD: COULD HAVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
• INTERVENTION BAD:  US HAS PERCEPTIONAL PROBLEM WITH DEMOCRACY PROMOTION
• INTERVENTION BAD: AFTERMATH CREATES PROBLEMS
• INTERVENTION BAD: MORAL IMPERATIVE NOT ENOUGH
• INTERVENTION BAD: US INTERVENTION FOR DEMOCRACY MISUSED AS A JUSTIFICATION
• INTERVENTION BAD: MUST DIVORCE MILITARY INTERVENTION FROM DEMOCRACY
• ALTERNATIVES TO INTERVENTION: MANY NON-INTERVENTION ALTERNATIVES EXIST TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY
• ALTERNATIVES TO INTERVENTION: WAIT IT OUT!
• ALTERNATIVES TO INTERVENTION: PROMOTE LIBERTY INSTEAD
• ALTERNATIVES TO INTERVENTION: PROMOTE STABLE RELATIONSHIPS INSTEAD
• DEMOCRACY AND TERRORISM LINK DOESN’T EXIST
• DEMOCRACY AND PEACE LINK IS SUSPECT
• DEMOCRACY ISN’T A PANACEA
• DEMOCRACY MAY NOT THRIVE IN ALL REGIONS
• DEMOCRACY WILL NOT THRIVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST
• DEMOCRACY DOESN’T MEAN AMERICAN FRIENDLY
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION BAD: GENERALLY
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION BAD: WILL INSPIRE TERRORISM
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION BAD: US HAS NO STRATEGIC INTERESTS IN LIBYA
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION BAD: ARAB NATIONS SHOULD TAKE THE LEAD, NOT THE US
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION BAD: US INTERVENTION MAY NOT BRING DEMOCRACY
• LIBYAN INTERVENTION BAD: DEATH NOT ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY INTERVENTION
• BALANCE CON POSITION: INTERVENTION MUST ALWAYS BE SELECTIVE
• BALANCE CON POSITION: SHOULD ONLY INTERVENE WITH AN INTERNATIONAL COALITION
• A/T: US PERCEPTION OPTIONS